For police force, online security tools can be a powerful pressure: They can take forensic evidence; allow for real-time monitoring of events; and help determine suspects. However the public needs to be fully educated about federal use of these technology. And when they are really used, all those tools needs to be strictly limited in their opportunity and time.
Visible video cameras are a criminal offenses deterrent: In areas where they are located, criminal offenses are often reduced. So when police can identify the faces of suspects, it could possibly produce it easier for them to get a conviction.
But also for some people, they make them feel less safe and secure. They’re also worried about the possibility that the government is certainly spying with them.
The NSA’s PRISM application monitors Net data, which include emails, board management software text messages, tone and video chats, social websites activity plus more. PRISM is a perfect example of how tools developed with respect to legitimate purposes can be abused and serve ends for which they were not really intended.
Technology companies that sell mass surveillance equipment should improve to ensure they aren’t enabling dictatorships and other countries to track dissidents and persecute minorities. EFF is struggling with lawsuits against Cisco Systems and also other companies for supplying tools to Chinese suppliers, where they’ve been used to track or arrest individual rights activists.
The F and Team of Homeland Security had been using they to target Dark Lives Matter protestors and others speaking out on concerns like racial justice and the treatment of migrants, justifying this by citing the specious category of “black identity extremism. ” These applications must come under better oversight, and government agencies that use these tools need to be held answerable when they break civil protections.
